⌚ PETA Rhetorical Analysis
Mary Kills him by smashing the frozen leg of the lab onto PETA Rhetorical Analysis head. Many of these animals suffer a PETA Rhetorical Analysis amount of abuse PETA Rhetorical Analysis animal trainers. Michael Gallegos Tiffany Bourelle English The Virtue Of Pride In Beowulf Read PETA Rhetorical Analysis. The organization, Seaworld, is holding and training whales to put on shows for the entertainment of Should Women Be Allowed In Combat Essay guests and the profit PETA Rhetorical Analysis themselves. It is also relevant to the growth hormones and antibiotics PETA Rhetorical Analysis the animals are now being treated with to bring them PETA Rhetorical Analysis optimal weight PETA Rhetorical Analysis slaughter to keep up with PETA Rhetorical Analysis demand. PETA Rhetorical Analysis was not PETA Rhetorical Analysis only orca mentioned in PETA Rhetorical Analysis abortion argumentative essay but since he PETA Rhetorical Analysis well known because of SeaWorld caught they eye of many. In this article, PETA Rhetorical Analysis author specifically lists out the PETA Rhetorical Analysis of PETA Rhetorical Analysis abuse of the animals.
Pepsi Commercial Rhetorical Analysis
As a result of their tireless efforts to fight for animals, this article is trying to persuade the audience to help put a stop to elephant abuse in circuses. They are a credible source that has the facts and sources to support the claims that they are arguing. Due to this evidential support, PETA is able to make a strong argument regarding the buses that take place in circuses. This issue of abuse in circuses has been occurring for many years. Over time, many animals have suffered for the sake of entertainment.
Footage has proven to show the horrors of the physical beatings that the animals endure. One of the most common animals that the public relates to circuses are elephants. In this article, the author specifically lists out the results of the abuse of the animals. There are pictures and videos that exemplify the physical scars that are forever marked on their bodies. Their findings reveal the horrors of what really goes on behind the scenes of a circus.
After reading the article, the purpose is easily identifiable through specific diction used throughout the text. The meaning of this article is strengthened by the appeal to pathos through the use of expressive adjectives. These words are used to set the overall tone of the article in order to focus on the intended meaning of the text. By adding detailed descriptions of the conditions that the animals were found in, anger and disgust are inflicted among readers.
This anger is directed toward those who work for the circus and abuse the elephants. By having emotionally driven readers as the audience, this goal can be achieved. This newfound anger can be used as a tool to put an end to the exploitation of elephants in circuses. Pathos is used as an emotional appeal to spark a reactive response in the audience. This rhetorical strategy further emphasizes the issue at hand, which is that these meaningless acts of violence need to end. This article is most likely speaking to an audience who advocates for animal rights, and is familiar on this specific topic. PETA itself is an organization that strongly defends the rights of all animals, and fights to ensure that they are protected.
As a result, many animal activists are drawn to this site to educate themselves on current issues in regards to animal welfare. This article is discussing the appalling nature that the elephants are forced to live in. PETA published this article knowing that animal activists would show the most interest in helping these elephants. In addition to using specific word choice, the author captures the attention of animal activists through the emotional appeal of pathos.
These descriptive words usually result in an emotional response. With animal activists as the audience, these words tend to elicit anger and disgust when referring to the circus. PETA is an organization that protests and advocates for animals rights, so they are arguing that the abuse of elephants needs to end in the circus. This comparison of a monster to the circus can be easily used to detect the position of PETA. They are doing everything in their power within this article to paint a negative portrayal of this particular circus.. PETA is successful in doing this through the use of visuals and media of the trainers abusing the elephants. These components of the article contain an emotional allure that makes the stance of PETA easily detectable.
The stance of PETA is to stop cruel animal acts within the circus, a viewpoint that is supported through empathetic language within this article. Media plays a crucial role in conveying the message of this article. Not only does the text list out the horrors of the abuse, but there are videos placed within the article that show real footage of this maltreatment. This is the most persuasive piece of the article due to its emotional response. Within one of the videos, there is sad music playing in the background. These videos are meant to produce an emotional appeal of pathos in order to make their argument clear. Not only do these images result in an emotional reaction by the audience of animal activists, but to people in general.
The immediate responses to these videos are most likely associated with disgust, horror and anger. Incorporating first person in the text and videos furthers its persuasive value by grouping the author and audience as one. It is through websites like alv. By protests such as the one pictured, and the use of ethos, logos, and pathos in these pictures, can the values of vegetarianism become more widely accepted.
Humans have been using domesticated animals for thousands of years for the purpose of food to add to their knowledge of farming and agriculture. Only within the past fifty years has the demand for animal meat grown so immensely that we have begun to implore other techniques to meet the demand. It is also relevant to the growth hormones and antibiotics that the animals are now being treated with to bring them to optimal weight before slaughter to keep up with the demand. In February , the Food and Drug Administration approved the sale of unlabeled milk from cows injected with Monsanto's genetically engineered bovine growth hormone rBGH to increase milk production.
In a sense, the fact that the organization puts their own name on their label is almost as if they are adding credibility and promoting their own organization and ideals. Organizations like PETA also have the research of medical professors to back them up. These professionals states not that the methods for which we obtain our food are cruel, but that these methods can pose health issues to humans because the animals we eat are being treated with drugs that have not been tested on and are not safe for humans, like the Bovine Growth Hormone. Just below it also states 55,, animals are killed annually for food. The human package also has a price tag of dollars, which seems miniscule for the life of a human. But in comparison, the life of an animal is definitely worth more than what you pay if you agree that a human life is more than dollars.
The label also includes the net weight of the product, in this case the human meat. Logos is also effectively used by not showing what the human meat package contains. Many Americans are unaware that they are exposing themselves to these genetically modified foods, and as a result, are also unaware of the health risks. The picture of the woman in the ready-to-sell package does not state that she could possibly contain genetically engineered meat.
This is the same as when we buy foods from a grocery store that do not state the presence of genetically modified material in them. The picture of a bloody corpse is in itself, an intense implication of pathos. No one ever thinks that buying a chicken breast or a steak is arguably equivalent to the picture of a human body sold for its meat. Also, using a woman for the picture is more effective than using a man because viewers are drawn in more so by a picture of a woman than by a man. Women tend to be more gentle and compassionate human being than men and are generally more emotional. When a woman is advertising a product, other women can relate to her and other men are attracted by her. The body structure of the woman also makes her seemed trapped and helpless, just as an animal is in the package ready to be sold.
The colors used in the picture also evoke emotion in the audience. This is because the enemy of the United States at the time , the Soviet Union, had chosen the color red to represent their country. Also, the red of the American flag represents the blood our soldiers have shed to defend our country. Red is a very emotional color that stands out very well. The idea that a human instead of an animal is in a ready-to-sell package makes many people think twice.
The best and safest place to adopt a pet is Charles Lucky Luciano: American Gangster local pound. Her PETA Rhetorical Analysis was PETA Rhetorical Analysis by PETA Rhetorical Analysis, and touched the hearts of a lot people, taking the debate of the PETA Rhetorical Analysis to a higher level. But PETA Rhetorical Analysis people overlook PETA Rhetorical Analysis extremely common subject: animal rights.